Curricula We Use

We are homeschooling this year using the curriculum and support materials provided by the Charlotte Mason Educational Center. I was happy to join their team this past spring and help with curriculum development and family support, as well as speaking, writing, and research.

We also have spent many years using AmblesideOnline, with a few tweaks for our Catholic beliefs and family preferences.

Mater Amabilis - a free Catholic Charlotte Mason curriculum
RightStart Math - our favorite math program
Evernote - my organizational e-lifeline!

For more details on what books we use when, check out my School Plans page, where I have our plans listed by year and subject.

(A Very Few of My) Favorite E-Reads

A Peaceful Day
Fisher Academy International
Flare of Light
Journey and Destination
Living CM in CA
Sage Parnassus
Where the Blacktop Ends
Family in Feast and Feria
Like Mother, Like Daughter
Pondered in My Heart
Wildflowers and Marbles
Learning How to Live

For the Newbie Charlotte Mason Homeschooler

31 Days of Charlotte Mason at Afterthoughts
Busted: 31 Days of CM Myths at Afterthoughts


  1. Hi there. I have been reading your awesome stuff, thank you. Question for you: you have Ambleside and Mater Amabilis- do you use both?

    1. Hi Jenny! I personally use AO, but I really appreciate the work that Mater Amabilis does and am part of the Facebook group for the Catholic CM chat. ;) I occasionally draw religion resources from the MA suggestions too.

  2. Great. Thank you for your rapid reply. I am trying to stuff it all in so that by Monday, at least some will grace our schedule to begin with.

  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. Hi Celeste! Math question - I have heard RS Math is awesome but also that it was so teacher-intensive as to be prohibitive for larger families. What do you think?

    1. Hi Samara! RightStart is not designed to be an independent program, especially in the earliest books. In Level B, it's pretty much entirely teacher-student interaction -- so for a 20 minute lesson, it's 20 minutes together. In Level C, it's maybe 15 minutes together, 5 minutes independent. Level D is more independent: 10 minutes together, 10 minutes apart. That's not the case every day, but it's the general pattern. The script is written for the teacher, not the student (as in, the answers are right there in the text), so even an advanced student who can read well can never sit down by himself with the book and do the whole thing on the own -- it's not built that way. BUT I personally think this is a strength of the program. :) It is what allows it to be about student exploration and not just a "teach the algorithm and do the worksheet" kind of set up. I don't think math in the early years works as well independently because it falls into that latter mode.

      So yes, it is teacher-intensive in that the teacher and not the book teaches the lesson. But there is very little prep time and it's easy to work through. I also feel very free to arrange the lessons to accommodate my student and our timetable -- so I will often break a lesson into two if it is taking too long, or do two lessons back to back if my child can get through it easily in the 20-minute block we have available, for example.

      I do think it comes down to your perspective on what math should look like in the younger years as well as family dynamics. :)

      I hope that helps!

  5. Celeste,
    I have a very math oriented ten year old who has out grown her math curriculum. I saw that you were using the Jacobs text with your kids and I wondered if you thought is was a good text. Mostly I'm concerned about the presentation and use of proofs in both algebra and geometry (which seems to be somewhat out of style). I'm just struggling to figure out what text we should be moving to next. Thank you ahead of time for any suggestions.

    1. Hi Addie,

      Yes, we are using Jacobs -- one of my children has moved from Algebra now into Geometry and the other is about halfway through Algebra. We really like these books! Jacobs style is engaging and the problems are both interesting and thorough. We are using the new edition of Geometry, which I read has fewer proofs that the older ones, but we are still getting plenty. :) You could always hunt down an old one, though, which I have read people really like. No complaints with either of these books so far. :)